Jordan Peterson on Dostoevsky: 22 Quick Points [Explained]:

thumbnail

I research a lot to find out about Jordan Peterson on Dostoevsky. I sum up my answer below;

Jordan Peterson on Dostoevsky: 22 Quick Points
Jordan Peterson on Dostoevsky: 22 Quick Points

You can read the novel by Dostoevsky. It’s for interest in phycology. 

He goes down into the depth of questions. It has transformative characters. Dostoevsky makes the opponent’s argument strong to fight with his perspective. The people who carry Dostoevsky’s beliefs are the strongest, Smart and most admirable people in the book. Dostoevsky embodies both ideas with powerful imaginable characters. 

Dostoevsky takes the question seriously. He is the model of true Intellect. Dostoevsky has an influence on Nietzsche. Dostoevsky criticizes the Utopian idea of Russians. It is about reorganising the society to eliminate the material prioritize. You have the part of dissatisfaction. The element of dissatisfaction requires satisfaction. 

 Raskolnikov rationality:

Jordan Peterson explains the Raskolnikov character from crime and punishment. He is materialistic and rational. 

The character has the idea of God’s death. Anyone who acts morally because of cowardness. We are unable to remove restrictions. In the novel, Raskolnikov acts the way above the norm. Read Jordan Peterson’s creativity.

Raskolnikov Economical issues:

Raskolnikov is a law student with enormous issues. 

He has not had enough to eat. His mother is ill. His sister decides to marry a man who supports her and her family. Raskolnikov observes the lies sister about falling in love with the man. 

Cruel landlady:

Raskolnikov has a pawnbroker(his landlady). The pawnbroker lady is cruel and brutal. She has a Niece with less intellect. 

She treats her niece as a Slave. 

Kill on a moral basis:

Raskolnikov is with the mess, half-starved, possessed get strange nihilistic ideas. He develops an idea about killing the pawnbroker, taking her wealth and freeing the niece. 

The idea is about removing one horrible and useless person from the world. It allows free the sister from necessary marriage. It gives him to go to law school and become educated to serve the world. 

Pathetic Thinking way:

A person argues with others or runs an argument in the head. They make the opponent into a straw man. 

They take opponents and curricula their perspective. Laugh about opponent arguments. They come up with arguments to destroy the straw man to obtain victory. It’s pathetic and not thinking at all. 

Different self after murder:

Raskolnikov has every reason to commit murder philosophically, ethically and practically. Raskolnikov kills the old lady with an axe. He observes that he is different before performing the murder. He experiences the universe of horror, chaos, deception and terror. Raskolnikov buries the money in the alley. 

Russian revolution and Raskolnikov:

The story of Raskolnikov doesn’t True. Raskolnikov’s embodiment of a particular person through ideology with the philosophical precursor of the Russian revolution. Raskolnikov becomes a composite person with eliminates the relevance. Jordan Peterson considers it More real or metra real.

Nietzsche’s morality connects with Raskolnikov:

Raskolnikov considers himself an atheist. Raskolnikov is Smart arrogant, not smart wise. He hates her apartment landlady. He becomes a rationalist and believes there is no evidence of any moral hierarchy. 

Jordan Peterson connects Raskolnikov with Nietzsche’s morality. Your morality is your cowardy. You love to do those things. You are brave as you’re not.

Strong in thinking opposite:

Thinking is you take the opponent’s position. You make the opponent as strong as you can. You fit your prospective against that Strong prospective. 

Brothers Karamazov Explanation:

In brothers Karamazov, Alyosha Karamazov is one of the protagonist’s innocent, good, naive side, religious but less ability to defend it. He is the follower of the famous monk. He is orthodox Christianity and benevolent. 

Alyosha’s older brother, Ivan Karamazov, is a tall, soldier and impressive guy. 

Ivan Karamazov has cutting intellect. 

He cut his brother out through Intellect. 

Ivan has strong arguments about not believing in God. 

Fight with polar arguments:

Dostoevsky fight with arguments in the novel. One Dostoevsky part is Spiritualization with its exaggeration. 

Other Dostoevsky part has a high intellect. Jordan Peterson considers Dostoevsky’s argument the best atheist Argument ever written. 

Suffering Russian child:

Dostoevsky talks about terrible things with the children in Russia in the late 1800s. The suffering of one child exists that distributes the benevolent belief in God.

He predicts what happen to Russia 40 Years before it happens. 

Dostoevsky and Nietzsche:

Dostoevsky and Nietzsche’s ideas are similar to each other in many ways. Nietzsche has Rationale with Intellect. Dostoevsky has rational and literary. 

Jordan Peterson believes that both have the same spirit. Dostoevsky has artistic work in the aesthetic realm. 

Argument based books:

His ethical characters lose every argument with rationalists and still better man. His book is associated with propositional Arguments. 

Beauty is non-propositional that goes under narcissist and blind rational Intellect that overvalues its ability. It’s lucifer’s spirit. It’s a pointer of your beyond understanding. 

Value virtue and beauty:

Jordan Peterson explains that people build beautiful things in past as cathedrals. More people don’t take beauty seriously. It’s a mistake that beauty isn’t a serious thing.

Religious people think god is the sum of good things. We connect all the virtues and consider it God. 

Beauty invites:

Beauty tells you more than you are. It aspires you that beyond you. It shares something beyond you that’s respirable. Beauty invites to come with it. 

Notes from the underground Explanation:

Jordan Peterson refers to the notes from the underground character.

He is a nasty Beaurocrat. He makes life miserable for other people. The character Uses his trivial put load over people. He is honest and tries to justify his life. She finds a woman who needs to save. He can’t save himself either. The character says that he is joking about saving the woman. 

Confess weakness:

The character shows his weaknesses and confesses them.  The confession makes the man comfortable. He brings everyone down to hurt. 

History has catastrophe:

Dostoevsky explains history is a catastrophe. Our Rationality fails the analysis of complex and terrible things of History. 

People try to be moral and rational. People become sooner or later false to themselves. 

Utopia against meaning:

The utopia idea is not workable. You give people what they want or need. There is no guarantee that people be sane. 

People put the risk what all you give them. A Man perseveres things out of ingratitude. A man without meaning drives destruction and chaos. The work of a man proves that he is a man, not a piano key. Your desire depends on unknown things. 

Dostoevsky against Marxism:

Jordan Peterson criticizes the Marxism idea through Dostoevsky. Marxism is about building a society with equal financial value. 

Dostoevsky explains that we’re not the creature that satisfies through material possession. We are not looking for food and sleep. 

Purpose over material:

Your life is not much better as you become rich. You are still required to conduct your self improper way with purpose. Normative ethics connects with its great history. 

Ethics drive western culture predicated on God’s ideas. 

Reference:

I am a student of success, loves to motivate you towards life. I survived through depression as 19 Years old. I write on Habbitts for 2 Years. A Self-help enthusiast guy keen to provide you with life-changing wisdom and mindset. I give you the best habits which I extract from the literature. I write in the light of world changer mentors. My Quora Profile: https://www.quora.com/profile/Shamaz-Abraham
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Back To Top
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x