Is “Forty rules of love” worth reading? 21 Pros And Cons [Explained!]

I research a lot to find the answer to the question Is Forty rules of love worth reading. Below I summarize my Quick answer;

The Forty Rules of love is worth reading. It explains Love through a spiritual basis in light of Sufism. Elif gives Islamic insights and deep Sufism understanding. Engaging, deep and valuing love focused book. 

It encourages relying on spiritual values for love. Weak writing is associated with a strong story. 

You can buy 40 Rules of love (Click below);

Forty Rules of Love Book Benefits:

Below, I mention the Benefits of reading Forty rules of love. 

Encourage life questioning:

Elif parallel stories explain the value of questioning. We get everything in life but still miss something. Life becomes meaningless without crucial aspects. The Questions are aware of us to go for the proceeds. 

Mixed Turkish culture with history:

Elif Shafak has deep insights into 13th-century Turkish culture. Besides, she shares the historical wisdom of Shams and Rumi. Her parallel stories compare the implementation of the previous role to find love now. 

Unity and love:

The author explains Sufism core complete. Sufism unity people irrespective of their religion. Every person wants love unconditional. Sufism allows everyone to fall in love with God. The creator lovers get love. 

Diverse acceptance:

The book encourages diversity to accept things in life. It brings love. You become spontaneous towards change that brings love. You welcome the new ways to experience life with depth. 

Islamic insights:

Elif explains the Islamic values towards love. Islam values or respect self-discovery. It yields eternal love. The book shows Deep insights about Quran, Hadith and Islam. 

Discovery love:

Elif Shafak explains the worth and transformation that comes through love. Discovering or digging deep in love ideas is worth doing. Love is essential but unachievable through the general parameters. Read about 6 Thinking Hats Application In Your Daily Lives.

Explains Rumi:

The author explains the enticing character of Rumi. The novel develops inspiration about Rumi. 

It explains the Rumi transformation after gaining love wisdom through the Shams Tabraiz. 

Unlock spiritual values:

We are lost in life without valuing our spiritual needs. A deep connection or love sense unlocks spiritual values. The spiritual connections develop enticing energy in life. 

Encourage believing:

Elif Shafak teaches the way believing impacts life. 

The belief shapes the hope for love. It explores love in several dimensions. 

Forty Rules of Love Survey 2022:

I survey Goodreads. I find out people view about Forty Rules of love worth reading. It assists you in finding out the Forty Rules of love rating with reasoning. 

Comment Catagories:No. of people:Reasoning:
Yes:204Different perspectives about Islam. Value love, spontaneity and acceptance.
The parallel moving stories make the book engaging.
Sufism is valuable.
Give inspiration about Rumi teachings.
Rise self-questioning.
Explains love through different dimensions.
Pushing yourself out from society brings out spirituality.
Accept and move with the change.
Shams rules are life-impacting.
Different love book.
Shams of Tabriz is an eccentric unpredictable character.
Deep quotes.
The deep conversation between Ella and Aziz grows friendship.
No:44Mislead about Islam.
Prefer being spiritual over religious. Not explain other Islamic ideologies like Shia.
Deep but not true idea.
Weak storyline.
Less logical.
Use modern language to explain 13th century people.
It Forced a way to insert rules.
Weak clichéd story.
Complete American language involved.
Shams-Rumi relationship is history.
Represent God through Fleshy metaphors.
Myths about Shams Tabraiz.
Shallow work.
Spiritual activities force the main character to leave her husband and child.
Neutral:47The strong concept with weak writing.
It’s Preachy tones, magical realism and no character depth.
The English version was not well written.
Shams confused motivations.
(Teacher) Shams breaks the rule himself in the book.
It sounds boring.
Every character views like drunk, prostitute or enlightened seem alike.
Reasoning about Sufism appealing.
Make Sufism another Islam side.
Narrative shifts to explain the lesson.
Present Sufism is a religion of love.
Sufism combines humans with God.
Never richly described.

The Forty Rules of love criticism:

Summarize Quick answer about The forty Rules of love criticism Below;

Confusing writing without any native touch. Make Sufism Islam part without pointing out other ideologies. Less logical approach towards love. Make religions similar for spiritual achievement. Some research issues. Ignore the result of being wrong.

Below, I mention prominent criticism about The forty rules of lovedetail.

Soap like a storyline.

Rise doubt but believe something is essential. The author ignores the language importance. Every character seems similar to getting love. 

Inept English translation:

Elif loses several crucial aspects of the story in English translation. She doesn’t explain the characters native tone. 

Unexplained Islamic ideologies:

Elif Shafak presents Sufism as a dimension of Islam. She doesn’t explain other ideologies that have spiritual values. The book doesn’t explain Shia Muslim, Suni Musli and Wahhabism. 

Unity of Being Sufism VS Unity of perception Sufism:

Elif explains Sufism as the unity of being. It means everything that exists associated with God, part of God. 

Oneness in appearance or perception is another Sufism dimension. It means that creator and creation are separate. Good and Evil exist. 

Less logical story:

Elif puts the main character in conflict with his lifetime achievement. She doesn’t explain the deep connection between getting love. The story seems pointless about leaving the family for love.

Enforcing rules:

Elif don’t place rule through proper incline in the story. She put rules without proper setting. Besides, some Rules have a contradictory impact on others. 

Being spiritual over religious:

It presents different ideas from reality. The author explains misleading with improper ideas about Islam. She says Being religious isn’t good but being spiritual is a good thing. Spirituality is different from Religion. We all have religious responsibilities.

Bring similarities in religion:

No doubt, other religions believe in the existence of God. But you do not develop similarities in religion. Inventing similarity is not about similar religious connections.

Ignore spirit and religious balance:

The author forces us to choose between spirituality and religion. She doesn’t find the balance between them. Choosing one enforces us to lose the other. 

Wrong people are complex:

Associate people with wrong choices through complex personalities. It puts peace through sins. Eliminate identification of being wrong or evil actions. 

Factual issues credibility:

Don’t have proper research about the main character. Don’t explain the facts properly. 

American style Eastern culture explanation:

Elif Safak has Turkish background. She explains the story with exoticism from Eastern culture. 

She gives the 13th-century story of Rumi and Shams American assent. There is no native attachment through the novel’s language. 

The forty rules of love inspiration For Elif Shafak:

Her first story assignment is Sweet Blasphemy, by A. Z. Zahara. It also discusses the friendship of Rumi and Shams of Tabraiz. It inspires Elif Shafak to write about Rumi and Shams. 

Similar books and authors:

Books like Forty Rules of Love:Similarities:Dissimilarities:
Eat pray love by Elizabeth Gilbert:Women protagonist.
Adopt change for Self-discovery.
Not Sufism. Personal choices then apprentice.
The secret by Rhonda Byrne:Researching for love brings love (Law of attraction).
Utilize imagination to explore existing love.
Not specify spirituality.
Not religious connection.
Paulo Coelho Alchemist:Value or using the treasure of love.Shares whole success philosophy.
The year of pleasures Elizabeth berg:Women move towards self-discovery journey.Explain life joy after losing someone.
Sophia’s world by Jostein Gaarder:Free will to choose things.
Transformation with practising lessons.
It’s Sophia’s world approach for Sufism.
Western philosophy focused.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *